More proof that China hid Covid as doctors say German had it in 2019

Is this more proof that Beijing hid Covid truth from the world? Doctors believe German man who had never been to China had illness in December 2019 – days BEFORE alarm was raised

  • EXCLUSIVE: 71-year-old German man had telltale signs of Covid infection in 2019
  • Read more: Covid testing scheme to be wound down just as cases start to rise 

Covid could have been spreading in Germany in 2019, according to fresh evidence which casts more doubt over China’s origin timeline.

Beijing didn’t alert the world about the mysterious virus circulating in Wuhan — the city at the centre of the pandemic — until New Year’s Eve 2019.

Yet a catalogue of studies have since poked holes in claims that Xi Jinping’s regime blew the whistle as soon as it became aware a new disease was circulating. Experts have uncovered numerous signs that Covid was already in Europe before alarm bells were raised.

MailOnline has now unearthed a fascinating medical report which further discredits China’s official version of events. 

Doctors in Berlin treated a 71-year-old man who had what they now suspect to be Covid, exactly one day before news broke of a cluster of Chinese patients were struck down with a SARS-like virus. 

Do these CT scans of 71-year-old German man’s lungs taken on December 30 2019 prove Covid was spreading in the country one month before the first official case?

The German case happened  one day before China officially notified the world about the Covid virus, but some reports said Beijing officials knew about the virus as early as November. File photo of medics at Wuhan Red Cross Hospital in January 2020 

Medics from Charité–Universitätsmedizin re-examined his case now armed with the knowledge of tell-tale signs of Covid that might have been glossed over at the time.

They wanted to see whether the virus was circulating prior to Germany’s first official  case recorded in January.

The man, who wasn’t identified, was admitted to hospital with pneumonia of an unknown cause on December 30, 2019. 

He was in a ‘poor’ condition, with an elevated heart rate, blood pressure and a fever.

Medics noted he was overweight, a smoker, and had previously suffered a stroke.

China’s official timeline vs new evidence

Official timeline 

Dec 8, 2019 – Earliest date that China has acknowledged an infection

Dec 31 – China first reported ‘pneumonia of unknown cause’ to the World Health Organization

Jan 1, 2020 – Wuhan seafood market closed for disinfection

Jan 11 – China reported its first death 

Jan 23 – Wuhan locked down

Jan 31 – WHO declared ‘outbreak of international concern’ as China admitted having thousands of cases

Feb 23 – Italy reports cluster of cases in first major outbreak in the West 

New evidence 

Oct 2019– Blood samples are taken in a lung cancer screening trial in Italy which later test positive for coronavirus

Oct-Dec – Rise in ‘flu and pneumonia’ cases in northern Italy which could be linked to coronavirus  

Nov – Sewage samples taken in Florianópolis, Brazil, suggest virus was present

Nov 10 – Milanese woman has a skin biopsy, producing a sample which later shows signs of the virus  

Nov 17 – Leaked documents suggest case detected in China on this date

Dec 1 – Chinese researchers report an infection on this date in a peer-reviewed study, but it has not been acknowledged by Beijing 

Dec 18 – Sewage samples taken in Milan and Turin suggest virus was circulating in the cities 

Dec 30 – 71-year-old man in Germany is admitted to hospital with ‘pneumonia’ now suspected to be Covid

Jan 2020 – Sewage samples from Barcelona suggest virus was in the city


But, critically, he had not been overseas recently, doctors wrote in the Journal of Medical Case Reports.

CT scans of his lungs indicated a potential viral infection of unknown origin, with tests for pathogens capable of causing pneumonia coming up negative. 

But these scans show a pattern of damage now familiar to millions of medics across the world, a ‘crazy-paving’ style in his lungs typical of Covid.

The authors wrote: ‘Considering the chest computed tomography (CT) findings, it is likely that our patient is one of the earliest cases of Covid in Germany.

‘This case suggests that Covid was already spreading in Germany in December 2019.’

The patient himself needed to be put on a ventilator four days after admission as his condition deteriorated. 

He spent a total of five days on a ventilator and was only discharged from hospital on January 28, nearly a whole month after his initial admission.

This was one day after the first officially confirmed Covid case in Germany — a case believed to be linked to meetings they held with a Chinese business partner.

Medics reported that the 71-year-old man later died in April 2020, but didn’t state the cause. 

The authors said the case added to the growing body of evidence suggesting Covid was spreading in several European countries in late 2019.

This includes the virus being detected in wastewater samples in Italy in December 2019, almost two months before the first official Covid diagnosis in the country. 

Separate analysis also found blood samples used in an Italian lung cancer screening trial in October 2019 later tested positive for coronavirus. 

And samples collected from French patients in December that year — which were tested retrospectively — have also come back positive for the virus, a month before the first official cases were spotted. 

Other findings, from Brazil and the US, have also reported that Covid was spreading much earlier than the first cases in either nation.  

While the first cases in the UK were detected on January 29, 2020, among Chinese nationals who arrived from Wuhan, there are similar suspicions the virus was already here months before then.

Beijing has insisted the virus only originated in mid-December, weeks before they notified the world about the pandemic as more cases came to light. 

Debate over the timeframe of when Covid emerged is also linked to a dispute over its origins. Pictured here is The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) where a number of experts think Covid could have leaked from 

But other Covid origin theories point to animals kept at Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan (pictured) as being the epicentre of the outbreak. Many of the earliest cases in December 2019 and January 2020 had visited the site, where live animals were sold

However, leaked documents from the Chinese Government indicate that officials were aware of some Covid cases as early as November, potentially costing the world precious time in the initial fight against the virus.

China has also repeatedly insisted Covid could have come from outside the country, suggesting it may come from frozen meat imported from elsewhere in Asia, and even at one point stating it may leaked from a US research lab.

The authors of the latest case report noted that they can’t officially diagnose their patient with Covid as blood samples taken from him have been disposed of and he never did a PCR test for retrospective analysis.   

Debate continues of when exactly Covid emerged is also tied up in how the virus came to be in the first place.

Some scientists support initial theories that the virus came from an unconfirmed animal source, possibly bats, before it jumped to another species held at the ‘wet market’ at the centre of the outbreak and then onto people. 

But other experts have said there is a growing body of evidence suggesting the virus actually leaked from the nearby Wuhan Institute of Virology, possibly as result of research being done there on coronaviruses. 


Evidence for Wuhan lab-leak theory

An article in the respected Science journal on May 14 2021 kick-started the surge in interest for the lab-leak theory.

Some 18 experts wrote in the journal that ‘we must take hypotheses about both natural and laboratory spillovers seriously until we have sufficient data’.

Later that month, a study by British Professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr Birger Sørensen claimed it had ‘prima facie evidence of retro-engineering in China’ for a year.

The study included accusations of ‘deliberate destruction, concealment or contamination of data’ at Chinese labs.

It followed statements from the WHO Director General, US and EU that greater clarity about the origins of this pandemic is necessary and feasible to achieve.

Previously, the theory had been dismissed as conspiracy by most experts, partly because of its association with President Donald Trump.

President Joe Biden in May 2021 ordered a full investigation into the origin of the pandemic virus and demanded scientists work out whether there is truth to the theory.

In December 2021, Harvard scientist Dr Alina Chan told the UK’s Science and Technology Select Committee that it is ‘reasonable’ to believe that Covid was genetically engineered in China. 

She also said that the Chinese Communist Party’s cover-up of the initial outbreak in Wuhan two years ago and attempts to sabotage the World Health Organisation’s inquiry into the origins of the pandemic made the lab-leak theory likely. 

The head of the World Health Organization insisted just a day earlier that the theory that Covid emerged from a Wuhan lab has not been ruled out — as he said China should help solve the mystery out of ‘respect’ for the dead.

The body’s director-general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, suggested that Beijing had not cooperated fully as he urged more ‘transparency’ in the continuing investigation.

And a senior Government source claimed in June 2022 that the WHO boss privately believes the pandemic kicked off following a leak from a Chinese lab. 

In September 2022, leading medical journal the Lancet admitted the virus may have been leaked from a lab, including those in the US. 

Evidence against the theory

Most of the scientific community say the virus is most likely of natural origin.

A series of papers point to the virus evolving in animals before being transmitted to humans, in the same way as all other previously discovered coronaviruses.

The first study, published in Scientific Reports, showed some 47,000 wild animals from 38 species were sold across four markets in Wuhan between May 2017 and November 2019.

The authors, including Dr Chris Newman, an evolutionary ecologist at Oxford University, claimed the evidence showed the conditions for animal-to-human transmission were in place in Wuhan.

But they acknowledged there was no proof Sars-CoV-2 was present or originated in any of these animals.

A joint World Health Organization-China investigation also concluded it was ‘very likely’ the virus jumped from bats to humans via an as-yet-unknown intermediary animal.

And a June 2022 report by the WHO sets out that Covid most likely originated in bats before infecting humans.

Source: Read Full Article